Criteria and domains
Understand how the quality areas are structured and what each domain aims to measure.
Explore the reviewA structured, version-controlled approach to review criteria, evidence, methodology and public reporting.
Eight proposed assessment domains provide shared review vocabulary. Detailed indicators, thresholds and procedural safeguards will be validated before use.
Leadership authority, transparency, delegated oversight and documented responsibilities.
Approved curricula, coherent learning outcomes and purposeful academic standards.
Competent educators, resourced learning environments and student engagement.
Fair assessment, moderation, identity assurance and academic integrity processes.
Admissions, orientation, student guidance, complaints and fair progression.
Platform accessibility, flexible participation, inclusive learning design and resilience.
Accurate institutional claims, protected personal data and clear public disclosures.
Feedback loops, actions taken, risk monitoring and evidence of continuous improvement.
Understand how the quality areas are structured and what each domain aims to measure.
Explore the reviewSee the proposed assessment, reviewer and reporting safeguards.
Explore the reviewLearn how QUAA distinguishes a written claim from verifiable implementation evidence.
Explore the reviewBegin with clear scope, published criteria and a realistic evidence inventory.