QUAA   QUALITY & UNIVERSITY ASSESSMENT AGENCYEvidence-based review initiative Institutional status
QUAA standards

Designed to be explicit.
Built to be examined.

A structured, version-controlled approach to review criteria, evidence, methodology and public reporting.

Version note QUAA Higher Education Review Framework v0.1 is a design draft; it has not been externally validated, approved as a certifying standard or applied in an operational review.
Framework architecture

One core framework. Different review scopes.

Eight proposed assessment domains provide shared review vocabulary. Detailed indicators, thresholds and procedural safeguards will be validated before use.

01 / DOMAIN

Governance & accountability

Leadership authority, transparency, delegated oversight and documented responsibilities.

02 / DOMAIN

Academic and programme design

Approved curricula, coherent learning outcomes and purposeful academic standards.

03 / DOMAIN

Teaching and learning delivery

Competent educators, resourced learning environments and student engagement.

04 / DOMAIN

Assessment & integrity

Fair assessment, moderation, identity assurance and academic integrity processes.

05 / DOMAIN

Learner journey & support

Admissions, orientation, student guidance, complaints and fair progression.

06 / DOMAIN

Digital access & inclusion

Platform accessibility, flexible participation, inclusive learning design and resilience.

07 / DOMAIN

Data and public information

Accurate institutional claims, protected personal data and clear public disclosures.

08 / DOMAIN

Quality enhancement

Feedback loops, actions taken, risk monitoring and evidence of continuous improvement.

01 / Framework

Criteria and domains

Understand how the quality areas are structured and what each domain aims to measure.

Explore the review
02 / Method

Review methodology

See the proposed assessment, reviewer and reporting safeguards.

Explore the review
03 / Evidence

What counts as evidence

Learn how QUAA distinguishes a written claim from verifiable implementation evidence.

Explore the review
Start with clarity

Build a reviewable quality system.

Begin with clear scope, published criteria and a realistic evidence inventory.

Prepare an enquiry
Detailed review domains: Explore six evaluation criteria resources. Public standards are not awards or accreditation decisions.