Defined criteria
Published review criteria, interpretation notes and version control offer a consistent basis for evidence-led discussion.
Explore the reviewQUAA — Quality & University Assessment AgencyQuality deserves evidence.
Quality deserves evidence.
Trust deserves verification.
QUAA develops transparent criteria and evidence-led approaches to reviewing universities, academic programmes and digital learning. Through QUAA Education, we focus first on European-informed higher education quality reviews with clear methods and public accountability.
Defined review scopes Evidence-led methodology Open verification principles
QUAA
Quality & University
Assessment Agency
Assessment Agency
GLOBAL STANDARDS. TRUSTED EVALUATION.
European frameworks
Global perspectiveMeasure what matters.
Global perspectiveMeasure what matters.
What we are building
A clearer way to establish confidence.
We design review approaches that make quality understandable, assessable and open to scrutiny. Credibility starts with transparent rules — not an impressive badge.
A rigorous process
Document-based analysis, proportional review design and clear separation of assessment and decision functions.
Explore the reviewVerifiable outcomes
A registry model that connects any legitimately issued result to its precise scope, status and supporting record.
Explore the reviewFlagship division / 01Education
first.Rooted in European quality principles, designed for institutions worldwide
first.Rooted in European quality principles, designed for institutions worldwide
Our first specialism
QUAA Education
European Higher Education Quality Reviews. Our initial work focuses on higher education institutions, academic programmes, online learning and continuing education, using a developing framework informed by European quality-assurance principles.
- Institutional quality review
- Academic programme evaluation
- Digital and blended learning review
- Continuing and executive education review
A review built to be understood
From a defined scope to a clear conclusion.
Every credible review needs an intelligible process, documented evidence and a decision mechanism that is protected from commercial influence.
01
Define the scope
Eligibility, objectives and boundaries agreed before evidence is collected.
02
Evaluate evidence
Documents, interviews and learning environments reviewed against clear criteria.
03
Report findings
Strengths, gaps, conditions and recommendations documented with traceable reasoning.
04
Publish responsibly
Where a valid decision has been made, the public record shows exactly what was reviewed.
Open by principleNo shortcuts.
No shortcuts.
No invented records.
The QUAA Public Registry is designed to protect the value of an assessment: searchable scope, evidence, review status and a stable reference for each legitimate published outcome.
There are currently no completed QUAA reviews in the public registry. The absence of entries is intentional, and reflects our development stage.
Open public registryPublic verification / IntegrityProof
first.No self-issued external accreditations. No unverified client listings.
first.No self-issued external accreditations. No unverified client listings.
Start with clarity
Build quality on a stronger evidence base.
Explore a review scope or prepare an institutional enquiry.
Public accountability
Evidence before claims.
Explore the QUAA Quality Code, the 40-criterion framework, published reports and public decision records. There are no published review decisions at this time.