Governing oversight
An appointed body to supervise mission, strategy, risk and independence — appointments pending.
Explore the reviewGovernance
Integrity has to be operational.
Our developing governance architecture separates assessment, commercial interests, decisions and public accountability.
Institutional safeguards
A review should not depend on who pays.
The following are proposed governance arrangements, not claims that a board, decision committee or reviewer network has already been appointed.
Assessment standards
A qualified expert function to control framework design and version changes.
Explore the reviewIndependent review decisions
A conflict-checked panel for substantive decisions, separate from sales and client relationships.
Explore the reviewAppeals and oversight
Documented opportunities to challenge procedural errors, request corrections and raise concerns.
Explore the reviewImportant related-party statement: QUAA may share founders or ownership interests with educational ventures including IEU. No review of an entity under common control may be portrayed as an independent external accreditation. Actual legal and related-party disclosures must be verified and published before the start of formal review services.
Start with clarity
Learn how QUAA intends to protect the review process.
Explore policies on impartiality, conflicts of interest and transparent outcomes.