What good digital learning
quality looks like.

Look beyond the platform interface

A polished learning management system is not, by itself, evidence of academic quality. Digital learning review should consider instructional design, interaction, access, assessment integrity, data handling and continuous improvement.

Proposed evidence areas

• Meaningful orientation and predictable learning structure
• Inclusive access and accessible media
• Authentic assessment and moderation
• Learner support and educator availability
• Evidence of implementation, feedback and improvement

Reference example

FIBAA’s 2026 digital education approach describes five standards and 21 criteria with maturity levels. QUAA does not claim affiliation and will develop original criteria rather than reproduce another body’s intellectual property.

Read FIBAA’s published digital education overview ↗